Making Sense of Student Sensemaking
How teachers can leverage the wealth of knowledge students bring to the classroom
By Mary E. Short
Science Curriculum Developer
Smithsonian Science Education Center
Students enter classrooms equipped with a rich foundation of skills and knowledge from their everyday experiences. High-quality science education builds on students’ wealth of experience in making sense of the world.
In science classrooms, sensemaking is a collaborative practice that includes students sharing initial ideas with peers and identifying inconsistencies or gaps in their shared understandings about the cause of phenomena or solutions to problems (Odden and Russ 2019). While sensemaking, students are continually drawing on their existing knowledge and integrating it with new information. Therefore, the process of sensemaking in science classrooms includes building or revising explanations for phenomena or iteratively working to solve problems and answer questions.
Why Should Teachers Prioritize Student Sensemaking?
Building New Knowledge from Lived Experiences
Once students have had a chance to use their existing knowledge to begin figuring out phenomena or solving problems, sensemaking includes identifying how another person’s experiences or new information does not fit with initial ideas (Campbell, Windschitl, and Schwartz 2016; Phillips, Watkins, and Hammer 2018). Central to designing curriculum for sensemaking is making ideas publicly available so that, through discussion with peers, students may identify inconsistencies or gaps in their thinking about a phenomenon or problem.
As students engage with new information through investigations, text, and media about a phenomenon or problem, they discuss what they notice. This provides opportunities to generate new ideas and sift through them in what Odden and Russ refer to as the “cultivation of a variety of alternative suggestions” (Odden and Russ 2019, 75). As new ideas proliferate among students, students activate additional prior knowledge they may not have considered relevant while developing their initial explanation of the phenomenon or problem. From here, students generate revised ideas using the new information; additional prior knowledge activated during discussion; or by engaging with new information surfaced through investigations, text, and media. Sensemaking, therefore, is a cyclical, collaborative process of thinking, sharing, and revising.
There are many ways curriculum can create robust sensemaking opportunities in science classrooms. Here, we focus on just a few—specifically, on how curriculum can support teachers in asking questions and using hands-on investigations, models, and digital simulations to help students make sense of phenomena and problems.
How Can Curriculum Support Student Sensemaking?
Science often starts with a question (NRC 2012). Therefore, one of the most popular ways teachers and curriculum developers encourage sensemaking is by posing questions that highlight gaps or inconsistencies in students’ initial explanations (Ford 2012). But what kinds of questions can teachers ask to support students’ sensemaking?
According to Campbell, Windschitl, and Schwartz (2016), questions that support student sensemaking press students to actively reason about the phenomenon or problem they are trying to figure out.
Examples of Questions That Support Sensemaking
- Requests for clarification about specific aspects of proposed explanations “Can you say more about what you mean by _____?”
- Pressing students to use evidence to support explanations “What makes you think _____?”
- Highlighting inconsistencies found across multiple explanations “I heard Hallie say _____ caused the phenomenon, but I heard Aman say _____ caused the phenomenon. Both can’t be true. How can we find out more about what happened?”
Sensemaking with Investigations
Just like carefully crafted questions, handson investigations provide rich sensemaking opportunities. During hands-on investigations, new information is generated through data students record and analyze. After analyzing the results of their investigations, students return to their initial ideas and revise them, incorporating the information or evidence that has emerged to better account for the cause of the phenomenon or problem driving the investigation.
For example, students may observe the phenomenon of an unhealthy plant. From prior experience, they may already have an idea that plants need water and light to grow. By collaboratively planning and carrying out a handson investigation, students arrive at more nuanced explanations to account for differences between a plant that has been living for some time without light and a healthy plant thriving with access to both light and water.
Using Texts and Media to Support Sensemaking
Using Models to Support Student Sensemaking About Problems and Solutions
Models and digital simulations can be useful both when making sense of scientific phenomena and when designing solutions to problems. In both science and engineering, when phenomena and problems are too large, too small, too complex, or too far away to be reproduced inside a laboratory or classroom setting, modeling and digital simulations are powerful tools through which students can observe phenomena and problems as directly as possible and activate new information for use in examining possible gaps or inconsistencies in their initial ideas.
One example of a problem that is too large to re-create in a classroom space is a school play area that becomes too hot to play on. By using lamplight to represent the sun and black foam to represent schoolyard asphalt, students can figure out that sunlight caused the schoolyard’s asphalt to warm up. Next, pulling together this new information and integrating it with existing knowledge, students may then refine their proposed solutions and understanding of the scientific phenomena. Ultimately, students may build and test models of their own design.
Three-Dimensional Sensemaking
REFERENCES
How the Smithsonian Science Education Center Supports Sensemaking